In banking, there is a common term called “reserve ratios” or “reserve requirements”.
For simplification, all this means is that government imposed regulations on private banks says that they are required to keep a certain amount of “money” (it isn’t really money…they call it “capital instruments” – something that is “as good as money”) back in the vault for every dollar they loan out. For example, if the reserve ratio is 10%, it means that the bank would keep 10 cents in the vault for every dollar they loan out.
We have been conditioned via government education not to think of this at all or at least rationalize this as a good idea. There can be many examples cited in history where depositor’s confidence in their bank was shaken, and they all lined up all at the same time to withdraw their money – a run on the bank. These were ugly scenes as you can imagine. Panicking people screaming, yelling, and fighting with bank staff – and each other – to be in line first before the bank ran out of cash.
To placate the populace, government:
- Mandated regulatory compliance on bank operations.
- Enacted a Central Bank as a lender of the last resort – or a donor of the first resort depending if a bailout is required.
- Setup a depositor’s insurance fund that would refund deposits in the event of the bank becoming insolvent. This of course would ultimately be paid by the taxpayer in the event a bank defaulted – essentially a subsidy to the bank owners, but hey, who cares?
In Canada, the reserve ratio was phased out in the Bank of Canada Act in 1992. Today, if you look at the Act, you will see the following stanza:
457. [Repealed, 1999, c. 31, s. 14]
It took some digging to find out what was contained in that section, but here it is:
457. (1) Subject to this section, a bank that was in existence immediately prior to the day this section comes into force shall maintain a primary reserve in the form of
(a) coins with a face value of two dollars or less that are current under the Currency Act;
(b) Bank of Canada notes; or
(c) deposits in Canadian currency with the Bank of Canada.(2) Subject to subsection (4), the primary reserve referred to in subsection (1) shall not be less on average during any prescribed period than an amount equal to the average of the monthly levels of required primary reserves calculated for the month in which this section comes into force and for the preceding 11 months, as determined under section 208 of the Bank Act, being chapter B-1 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985.
(3) Where a bank to which this section applies has been, on the day this section comes into force, in existence for less than 12 months, the primary reserve referred to in subsection (1) shall not be less on average during any prescribed period than an amount equal to the average of the monthly levels of required primary reserves calculated for the month in which this section comes into force and for the preceding months it has been in existence, as determined under section 208 of the Bank Act, being chapter B-1 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985.
(4) On the first day of the first month following the month this section comes into force, the primary reserve referred to in subsection (2) shall be reduced by 3 per cent, and thereafter on the first day of the first month of each of the next three succeeding six month periods, the primary reserve as modified by this subsection shall be reduced by 3 per cent, and on the first day of the twenty-fifth month following the month in which this section comes into force, the primary reserve referred to in subsection (1) shall be nil.
…
What I cannot determine is when the above was actually PASSED into law. All I seem to find is other sites stating it was sometime around the early 1990s. I’ll keep looking. If anyone knows and has proof, drop me a line and I’ll update this post.
Update: It seems that the above text was quietly passed into law in December of 1991, via Bill C-19. I need to find a reputable source for this.
What it says is that when this act is passed into law, the bank reserve requirement will fall over a 25 month period until the Bank Act of Canada no longer requires the bank to keep ANY reserves.
What i did find was Bill C-84. This bill was sponsored by the Minister of Justice and was described as:
An Act to correct certain anomalies, inconsistencies and errors and to deal with other matters of a non-controversial and uncomplicated nature in the Statutes of Canada and to repeal certain Acts that have ceased to have effect
This a housecleaning bill. Section 457 is one of them. If you have a “time bombed” clause like section 457 and it has expired, why keep it in the Act? In other words, it is a lot nicer saying:
457. [Repealed, 1999, c. 31, s. 14]
than:
457. “We changed this requirement. Banks don’t have to have ANY money in the vault to back their loans. We, the government of Canada, authorize them to mint as much checkbook money out of thin air as the market will bear. We will stay out of the banks business as they must know what they are doing. However, if they screw up, we will make sure the citizen bails them out via inflation and extortion…ooops, we meant taxation. Well, we would do that anyway. Good luck with that!”
This is why if you look at the Bank Act today, you will see no mention of any reserve requirements at all.
Ugh.
4 responses so far ↓
GWilly // April 18, 2008 at 10:00 pm |
Gilligan – how do you think Canadas “reserve ratios” compares with international central bank ratios?
Here in the UK it was just broadcast that we hold 50% reserves in the high st banks
our central bank has just swapped 100 Bllion US Dollars in uk gov bonds (see #1 below) for equivalent mortgage loans, it acts as your statement says?
I hope “ultimately be paid by the taxpayer ” is not so accurate ;-(
What kinda shape does this likely leave us in after the current Crunch
nice post Gilligan
thx
#1 to put this amount in perspective of the UK economy, Each year Our georgeous ladies spend around 14 Billion Dollars on Bodycare products, this amount is also equiv to 6 mths of uk mortgage loans made
Please Double check these perspectives – as always dyofr
Wayne // July 31, 2008 at 11:18 am |
The Canadian book ‘Bank Heist’ is a good history of the Canadian banking system. However, the edition I have is a little older when I think there was about 1% as a reserve requirement. Interesting to know they scrapped it alogether.
I must see movie on the world’s money system going back to pre-Christian times is the Money Masters. You can watch the whole thing on the net or buy the DVD.
Did you know that Caesar was assassinated by the ‘money changers’ to keep control of the money supply when Caesar was planning to introduce ‘real’ money? You can learn much about this history on that 2 DVD series.
Wayne
database // October 21, 2008 at 10:03 am |
Great.
P.S. I think you will find a reputable source at amazon marketplace. Because there is no use for outdated statute books/codes/civil law books (As a German, I don’t know the correct word), you will get them very cheap. You just have to look for the year or the edition you are searching for.
PK // December 4, 2008 at 1:26 am |
Very good facts collection!
Even I was searching about the same while looking for Canadian Monetary Policy Measures, and Monetary Aggregates. On Bank of Canada website only one measure is mentioned, i.e, Overnight Rate of Interest. I was wondering how only one measure is sufficient to operate a nation’s Monetary Policy.
Then I searched for Reserve Requirements. I could see only one line “Over the 1992–94 period, however, reserve requirements on bank accounts were phased out.” in the article ‘Analyzing the Monetary Aggregates’ on
http://www.bankofcanada.ca/en/review/2001/
macleane.pdf
You can see the article. But I got more information from your write-up than from elsewhere. Thanks very much!