Hello Folks,
A second article appears in the Washington Times (the link seems to be broken from ronpaul2008.com) Update: This is now the complete article

Article published Nov 19, 2007
Unlikely allies unite for Paul’s quixotic bid

November 19, 2007
By Stephen Dinan – PHILADELPHIA — They are crusty Iowa farmers enticed by doing away with the income tax, libertarian-minded college students in heavy-metal band T-shirts, antiwar Republicans looking for a champion, and folks worried about the Federal Reserve Board and paper money.

They say they are the disaffected in politics, and this year they are finding a political home with Ron Paul, the congressman from Texas who is shaking up the Republican presidential contest with phenomenal fundraising and the potential to convert that into enough votes to be a spoiler come January.

Even without the fife-and-drum players, they are the loudest of crowds. Even without the “Don’t Tread on Me” flags and cloak-and-mask movie costumes, they are the most colorful. And Mr. Paul’s supporters certainly are the most suspicious of the political process.

“I don’t want to sound like one of these nut cases, there are probably some of them here,” said Tom Levins, waving his arm toward 2,000 fellow supporters rallying with Mr. Paul on Nov. 10 in Philadelphia. “But you have to wonder about the establishment. I’ve had it cross my mind, could he be the next political person knocked off?”

(Gilligan’s Note: Have you ever seen some of the “fringe elements” posting on Fred Thompson’s Forum? For a hysterical laugh, go here)

For Mr. Levins and other supporters, Mr. Paul is more than just a choice on the Republican primary ballot. He is talismanic, a 72-year-old 10-term congressman who transcends partisan politics. For them, he’s the man who can restore the Constitution, end the Iraq war, bring back the gold standard for money and stop an erosion of civil rights.

Before his political career, Mr. Paul was a doctor — first an Air Force flight surgeon and later an obstetrician — and his frequent votes against spending bills and ever-expanding federal programs earned him the nickname “Dr. No.” He also was the Libertarian Party nominee for president in 1988, running a distant third.

His supporters cheer his willingness to stand up to institutions of power, and his recent tussle with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke at a congressional hearing has become a cult hit among the candidate’s supporters on YouTube.

“It’s not about the issues, it’s about the Constitution,” said Michael Hamme, one of the rally-goers. “Basically, as I see it, we’re run by the Federal Reserve system, which is actually not legal.”

The words “authentic” and “honest” pop up repeatedly when his supporters talk about Mr. Paul, and many say that’s why they’re willing to overlook their disagreements — and for a candidate who embraces an end to the drug war, the Internal Revenue Service and abortion, just about everyone finds something to disagree with.

“He’s kind of no style and all substance. He wouldn’t be in the game if he didn’t really believe in what he’s saying,” Jacob Lyles, a 24-year-old investment banker from Arlington said in a telephone interview. He said Mr. Paul’s authenticity cuts through a lot of the political clutter to grab supporters. “I think that’s kind of the exact opposite of what his Republican opponents are saying.”

The rise of Mr. Paul and fellow Republican upstart candidate Mike Huckabee suggests the unsettled nature of the Republican field. While Mr. Huckabee’s ascent has been characterized by poor fundraising and a slow-but-steady buildup of old-fashioned word of mouth, Mr. Paul’s campaign has benefited from phenomenal fundraising and an Internet-powered explosion.

Mr. Paul told the Philadelphia crowd the Internet has become “a very strong political equalizer,” and Michael Cornfield, a political scientist who studies campaigns and the Internet, said he is the type of candidate to harness it.

“There’s a sort of romantic aura that descends around the head of someone who’s seen as willing to speak his mind, no matter what. He’s not in control of the consultants; he’s not calculating,” he said.

At times the Internet-based supporters actually are leading the campaign — which is how the campaign wants it.

When some supporters called for a mass-donation day on Nov. 5, the British Guy Fawkes holiday, taking their lead from the “V for Vendetta” movie, the campaign was fine with standing back and watching the money roll in — more than $4 million in one day.

Supporters have vowed to try to top that figure with “Tea Party ’07,” timed for Dec. 16, the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party.

“That’s going to be big,” Mr. Cornfield said. “If you do something once, that gets everyone’s attention. If you do something twice, you’ve got a movement.”

The Ron Paul movement already is gaining a reputation, at least online, where articles and blog postings about its champion draw hundreds of responses, many of them angry and nearly all of them accusing major press outlets of ignoring Mr. Paul.

The vitriol of some supporters prompted one popular conservative Web site, redstate.com, to ban most Paul supporters from its discussions. The moderator of the site said it was getting “annoying, time-consuming, and bandwidth-wasting responding to the same idiotic arguments from a bunch of liberals pretending to be Republicans.”

Still, supporters said their movement shouldn’t be judged by its loudest members.

Rob Kampia, a supporter and executive director of the D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project, said his experience with activist politics suggests there are quiet supporters behind the forthright ones.

“If the Ron Paul supporters are coming off as more kooky than average, it doesn’t really surprise me, because we’ve seen in the marijuana movement the people who are most likely to come out for a controversial cause are those who have less to lose,” said Mr. Kampia, who has contributed the maximum $2,300 to Mr. Paul’s campaign.

Mr. Paul’s supporters say that they’re not liberal; they’re the true conservatives. But many of them are going to be first-time Republican primary voters. At the Philadelphia rally, an informal survey found party-switchers appeared to be the norm.

“I tell you what, it hurt,” said Bob Larkin, who changed his Connecticut registration to vote in the Republican primary. “I had to swallow the bile and do it. As soon as Super Tuesday is gone, I’m independent again.”

Shawntae Devlugt, who switched her registration in New Jersey from Democrat to Republican in order to vote for Mr. Paul in the primary, said she was never going back. “Kerry messed that up for the Democrats,” she said, blaming the Massachusetts senator for his 2004 defeat. “He can’t prove he didn’t throw the election to Bush.”

Ms. Devlugt stood out among the Philadelphia supporters for more than her green Statue of Liberty outfit, complete with Lady Liberty tiara. She also was one of the few black supporters present, a fact that did not go unnoticed by one passing car with several Barack Obama stickers on it.

Its two white occupants kept telling her Mr. Paul is racist, Ms. Devlugt said. She told them she’d been to plenty of rallies and never detected any racism from Mr. Paul’s words or from his supporters.

Not all of Mr. Paul’s supporters are newcomers.

Mr. Levins, who first came across Mr. Paul in the 1970s and has received his Freedom Report newsletter for years, said as a non-Texan, he had been waiting for the day he could have a Ron Paul bumper sticker. With a mixture of sheepishness and pride, he and his wife admitted to having the Ron Paul cookbook at home.

“I look at some of these people, and I say to myself, ‘Yeah, it’s weird’ or whatever — I just think finally there may be a trend in this country where people are fed up with what they’re hearing,” he said. “There’s no sheep here, there’s wolves here, questioning our nation’s government.”

The link from the Washington Times appears to be broken, but you can click here and try your luck)

A second article from the Washington post with you:

If It’s Good Enough For Mickey, Why Not For Paul?


Pirate’s booty valid at Walt Disney World. (Walt Disney World News).

News of a federal raid last week on a “sound money” outfit that is selling “Ron Paul Dollars,” reported in Saturday’s Post, is generating no end of quips in the blogosphere about what this development says about the Paul campaign’s eye-popping recent fundraising success. Wags ask: How much of that record $4.2 million one-day haul that Paul collected earlier this month actually came in the form of dubloons imprinted with Paul’s face, not U.S. legal tender?

But these jokes may be missing the point entirely. In fact, the lack of confidence that many Paul supporters have in U.S. currency may well be one reason why they are sending so many of their greenbacks to Paul’s campaign, and thereby making his outsider libertarian bid for the Republican presidential nomination a force to be reckoned with. For sound-money supporters who fear a coming collapse in the value of the dollar, it makes eminent sense to send a few hundred dollars to the one candidate who is arguing for a monetary revolution, instead of simply watching that money rapidly crumble in value.

As Exhibit A, consider Peter Schiff, a financial adviser and sound-money advocate whose Connecticut firm, Euro Pacific Capital, specializes in investing clients’ money in overseas assets to spare them what he argues will be a destructive decline in the value of the dollar followed by major deterioration in the U.S. economy. Schiff, who earlier this year published the investment guide “Crash Proof,” recently sent out a “call to action” e-mail to the 60,000 people in his database urging them to send the $2,300 maximum-allowed contribution to Paul’s campaign, describing this as one of the most productive uses for their rapidly fading U.S. dollars.

“If you are fortunate enough to be one of my clients, writing a $2,300 check should not be a problem. As I have likely made you tons of money over the years, here is an opportunity to donate some of it to a worthy cause. We have made our money by betting against the U.S and betting against the dollar. Giving $2,300 of our winnings to Ron Paul gives us the opportunity to bet ON America for a change. And it’s a bet none of us can afford to lose, and the best part about it is that if we all make this bet together we can’t lose,” Schiff wrote in the e-mail. “My penchant for foreign investments has from time to time caused some of my critics to label me unpatriotic. While such attacks are clearly out of line, using some of our foreign profits to secure the election of Ron Paul goes a long way toward defusing such allegations. If you are not a client and you think $2,300 is a lot of money, it’s not. In fact, if Ron Paul is not our next President, such a sum will be practically worthless by the end of the term of whoever is. So what do you have to lose? Just write the check and hope for the best.”

In an interview today, Schiff said he expects that the federal raid on the National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve and Internal Revenue Code had added more weight to his argument for giving to the Paul campaign. “The federal government is debasing the currency and then it comes in and punishes people who are doing something to protect themselves,” he said. “The fact that these guys would come in and raid this organization shows how much they’ve got to fear from this. If more and more people start shunning the currency, it takes away from their power.”

Norfed, which is based in Evansville, Ind., says that in the last decade it has put into circulation more than $20 million in “Liberty Dollars,” metal medallions and paper certificates that it says are backed by silver and gold stored in Idaho. The group’s founder and director, Bernard von NotHaus, says that federal agents seized more than 50,000 copper “Ron Paul Dollars” that the group was selling for $1, in addition to smaller amounts of silver Ron Paul Dollars that sold for $20, gold ones that went for $1,000 and platinum ones that went for $2,000. Agents also raided the Idaho minting company that makes the organization’s medallions, seizing the huge pallets of silver and gold stored there, von NotHaus said.

The FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office in western North Carolina, which is handling the case, have declined to comment on the raids, but an affidavit filed in Asheville earlier this month describes a two-year long undercover investigation of the group, based partly on evidence obtained by an informant who posed as someone wanting to become a regional associate for the group. The affidavit states the group is being investigated for federal violations including “uttering coins of gold, silver or other metal” and “making of possessing likenesses of coins.” “The goal of Norfed is to undermine the United States goverment’s financial systems by the issuance of a non-governmental competing currency,” the affidavit states.

This argument met with ridicule over the weekend from the prolific on-line network of Ron Paul supporters and sound money advocates, some of whom sarcastically predicted that the feds would next be going after Disneyworld for selling “Disney Dollars” for use inside the amusement park. “Here is a Mickey Mouse coin issued by that criminal, separatist organization, the Walt Disney Corporation. Did someone fail Common Sense 101?” wrote one commenter on the Post’s Web site, offering a link to an image of the offending Mickey dubloon. Wrote another, “With commemorative coins advertised in every Sunday newspaper, and given the Donald Duck silver coins sold at Disney Land, this is an obvious attack on Ron Paul, a legitimate Presidential candidate, by the Federal Government. I am going to respond by going to Ron Paul’s web site, easily found with Google, and giving $100 today.”

Lawrence White, an economics professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, said Liberty Dollar supporters had a point in charging overreaction on the part of the federal government. The question to be asked of Liberty Dollars, he said, is whether they make any sense for customers to buy — while the certificates may offer a hedge for those convinced that the dollar will go in the tank, they come with the obvious downside that it is difficult to find others willing to accept the Liberty Dollars as a legal tender (though not in Berryville, Ark., where, according to the chamber of commerce, about half of the town’s 80 merchants accept Liberty Dollars.)But that choice should be up to Americans to make, White said. “Unless they think people are being defrauded, it seems absurd to me,” he said of the raid.”The public ought to have a choice. Thank goodness we have an alternative to the post office.”

A spokesman for the U.S. Mint responded to questions today by pointing reporters to the “consumer alerts” portion of its Web site, which carries warnings against using Liberty Dollars alongside warnings against mistaking as legitimate currency coins including: “Silver surfer” quarters created to help market the Fox movie “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer”; a “Freedom Tower Silver Dollar” originating from the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; and an “Elvis Presley 25th Anniversary Tennessee State Quarter Tribute.”

A Paul campaign spokesman, Jesse Benton, today reiterated that the campaign has no connection with the Ron Paul Dollars (though supporters have taken pictures of grinning Paul next to the coins.) He said the campaign is seeing an “uptick” in Web site visits and contributions following reports of the raid. The real test of the campaign’s fundraising strength, though, will come next month, when supporters are organizing another one-day fundraising “bomb” timed with the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party.

Von NotHaus is doing his part, urging on his Web site (which he says has seen a huge spike in traffic) that supporters respond to the raid by contributing to Paul, as well as urging them to sign up as part of a class-action lawsuit against the federal government over the coin seizures. He is biding his time at his home in Miami, expecting to be arrested and indicted sometime in the near future. In fact, he said today that he is kind of hoping that the government makes its move sooner than later, so eager is he to make a stand on the part of sound money theories.

“I’m sure I’m going to be arrested, and I’d be disappointed if I’m not,” he said. “I want to get going. I think it’s going to be exciting.”

–Alec MacGillis

Posted at 3:24 PM ET on Nov 19, 2007

Advertisements